SNIPETS OF THE HEARING EXPLAINED Part 1
(Kaalaman ang tanging susi ng ating kalayaan mula sa sindikatong nagnanakaw ng ating boto)
Si Senate President Vicente Sotto III talaga ang taong nagbigay ng big break upang lumabas ang isyu ng dayaan sa halalan. Maraming salamat, Tito Sen.
Advertisement
Hiningi ni Tito Sen ang DNS logs (listahan ng detalyadong mga kaganapan sa DNS server) kung saan unang dumaan ang 459 voting machines na handa ng magtransmit ng resulta isang araw bago pa man ang halalan o Mayo 8.
Walang dinala ang COMELEC. Merong nakita si Sen. Pimentel na bahagi ng logs pero Mayo 9 na. 5 buwan na itong hiningi ni Tito Sen pero kahit pa alam na ng COMELEC na hihingin itong muli sa hearing, hindi pa rin dinala.
Alam nila na mahuhuli talaga sila kaya ayaw ibigay o ipakita. Pero dahil na corner na sila nang ipinakita natin na may kopya na tayo, ibibigay na raw nila "bukas." Tingnan ninyo ang mukha ni Chairman Abas.
Nag-expect si Tito Sen na kompleto ng answers and ammunitions ang COMELEC pagdating sa hearing. Wala po sila nito dahil ang bitbit lang nila ay pawang mga palusot lamang. Umubra ito noon pero di na ngayon. Kaya ayan, kitang-kitang ng publiko ang kanilang kasinungalingan at walang nagawa ang mga bantay ni Leni Robredo.
-GLENN CHONG
TINANGGAL NG FACEBOOK ANG ORIGINAL POST NG VIDEO NA ITO.
TO FACEBOOK PHILIPPINES:
I wrote last night an article sharing the post of DECONSTRUCTED MEDIA which you took down this morning. In that post, I explained why rappler.com has engaged in spreading fake news by twisting its report concerning the questions of Sen. Franklin Drilon to me. I explained why the rappler article failed to disclose the full truth.
When you took down the post of DECONSTRUCTED MEDIA, along with it came down my legitimate explanation of the events. I am asking that you restore that portion because that is legitimate. I am entitled to answer unfair attacks against my person and integrity. Rappler.com or any media entity for that matter has absolutely no license to attack me without meriting an appropriate response from my end. This video forms part and parcel of my defense against these attacks. Now, if you take this down again, I will be compelled to haul you to court along with rappler.com.
Any restraint against legitimate expression of public interest issues (the main issue in contention here is the serial cheating of our past three elections) is a violation of Article 32 of the Civil Code of the Philippines which provides for damages against the offended party when any private individual, directly or indirectly obstructs, defeats, violates or in any manner impedes or impairs any of the following constitutional rights and liberties of another person xxx (2) Freedom of speech xxx.
Since you are operating within the jurisdiction of the Republic of the Philippines, you come within the jurisdiction of our laws and courts.
I am not looking for quarrel. Just respect us and the advocacy we are fighting for.
PARA SA MGA NAGPOST NG ISYU TUNGKOL SA HEARING KAHAPON SA SENADO AT SA ISYU NG DAYAAN SA HALALAN, KUMUHA PO KAYO NG PICTURE NG INYONG POST O SHARE. KAPAG TINANGGAL ITO NG FACEBOOK, KUMUHA ULI KAYO NG PICTURE NG NOTICE NA TINANGGAL ITO. MAGAGAMIT NATIN YAN KUNG SAKA-SAKALING KASUHAN ANG FACEBOOK SA PAGLABAG NG ARTICLE 32 NG CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES. MAGKAKAPERA PA KAYO FOR THE DAMAGES SISINGILIN NATIN SA KANILA FOR VIOLATING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
-GLENN CHONG
No comments:
Post a Comment